By
By
Webinar Library
DNA Testing Methodology and Skills Evidence

Right Place, Right Time, Right Person: Intersections of DNA and Document Evidence

Paul Woodbury, MEd., AG
Nov 2, 2022
1.7K views
CC
Want to watch the full webinar?
Join now to access all 2,106 webinars and unlock all features.
Join now
Syllabus
Join now

Content

Play. Playing.
Welcome
2m 26s
Play. Playing.
Speaker's Introduction
1m 11s
Play. Playing.
Introduction
9m 38s
Play. Playing.
Biological Context
7m 21s
Play. Playing.
Chronological Context
1m 51s
Play. Playing.
Geographic Context
3m 58s
Play. Playing.
Cultural Context
3m 08s
Play. Playing.
Historical Context
2m 29s
Play. Playing.
Modern Exceptions
8m 52s
Play. Playing.
Records
22m 01s
Play. Playing.
Announcements / prizes
5m 31s
Play. Playing.
Questions / answers
9m 17s

About this webinar

While genetic evidence can aid in the resolution of research obstacles, at the end of the day, genetic genealogy is just genealogy and must be considered within the context of documentary evidence. Even so, the aims of documentary research to make sense of anomalies in genetic evidence often center around finding the right person in the right place at the right time to be an ancestor of a research subject. Learn how to creatively use documentary evidence to recognize and detect intersections of DNA and document evidence.

About the speaker

About the speaker

Paul Woodbury, MEd., AG
From a young age, Paul Woodbury fell in love with genealogy research. To pursue his passion for this field, he studied genetics and family history at Brigham Young University. To aid in his desire to share his knowledge with others, he has also re
Learn more...

Comments (79)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1000 characters remaining
Cancel Submit

Sort by Newest
Sort by Close.
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Likes
  1. SC
    Susan Clasen
    1 year ago

    Fabulous webinar. I am close to identifying, through Y-DNA, my biological great-grand-father. Your ideas will help me narrow things considerably or so I hope. Dealing with the 1870s in Canada, so I have to be creative.

    Sue Clasen

    Reply
  2. JH
    June Hedge
    1 year ago

    great

    Reply
  3. MA
    Marilyn Astle
    1 year ago

    Today’s webinar provided an excellent checklist of factors to consider in assessing relationships of DNA matches.

    Reply
  4. RA
    Rita Abramoski
    1 year ago

    Great webinar and well presented. I don’t think I would have thought about how much time would be needed for conception! Loved the statistics provided along with the areas of context to take into account and all of the records to consider.

    Reply
  5. DC
    Dawn Carlile
    1 year ago

    I gained new insight into ways to identify birth parents and eliminate candidates. Brilliant webinar!

    Reply
  6. DP
    David Ponter
    1 year ago

    Very interesting, Although I have followed most of the paths suggested I have never actually listed the steps and I am sure have missed some paths, so, in future I will have a check list set up headed by Interactions of DNA and document evidence.

    Reply
  7. XM
    Xana Miller
    1 year ago

    Thank you

    Reply
  8. CD
    Cynthia Davis
    1 year ago

    Very informative

    Reply
Show all comments

Related Webinars

1:07:24
BCGMethodology and Skills
Steamer Kate Explosion: Correlating Indirect Evidence to Identify and Correct an Error
Ann Staley, CG, CGL
462 views
CC
Steamer Kate Explosion: Correlating Indirect Evidence to Identify and Correct an Error
What happens when the indirect evidence of a death occurring and a probate record don't agree? The research begins in earnest! That's what happened in the case of the death of Antoine/Anthony Lallament of Mobile, Alabama. Who is Antoine and what relationship is he to me? When did he actually die? Which record is correct? What would other available records reveal? How is the explosion of the Steamer Kate involved? We have more questions than answers. This case study provides the research methodology involved in solving this problem.
BCGMethodology and Skills
Steamer Kate Explosion: Correlating Indirect Evidence to Identify and Correct an Error
CC
Ann Staley, CG, CGL
462 views
What happens when the indirect evidence of a death occurring and a probate record don't agree? The research begins in earnest! That's what happened in the case of the death of Antoine/Anthony Lallament of Mobile, Alabama. Who is Antoine and what relationship is he to me? When did he actually die? Which record is correct? What would other available records reveal? How is the explosion of the Steamer Kate involved? We have more questions than answers. This case study provides the research methodology involved in solving this problem.
Wed, October 18 2023: 0:00 UTC
Register for free
1:23:36
Methodology and Skills
Help! How do I separate genealogical fact from fiction?
Carol Baxter
855 views
CC
Help! How do I separate genealogical fact from fiction?
We sit at our computer searching for information about our ancestors and … click … we find something new and intriguing. But wait: it contradicts something else we’ve found. Clearly, both pieces of information can’t be true. So which is true and which isn’t? Or are both untrue? HELP! Until recently, most researchers developed their evidence-analysis skills by a process of trial-and-error. Unfortunately, many researchers have erred more than tried and seem to be the ones most prolific in publishing the results of their “research” on the internet. Yet these errors can prove disastrous, gobbling up our precious time and money as we search in the wrong place – or worse, as we pursue the wrong ancestral line. So how do we ensure that our conclusions are accurate? This seminar will show you how to evaluate our ancestral information – that is, how to weight each piece of information to determine its accuracy – using a clear, logical, easy-to-follow system. After learning these skills you’ll easily be able to determine which information is reliable and which is like a virus that can destroy all your hard work.
Methodology and Skills
Help! How do I separate genealogical fact from fiction?
CC
Carol Baxter
855 views
We sit at our computer searching for information about our ancestors and … click … we find something new and intriguing. But wait: it contradicts something else we’ve found. Clearly, both pieces of information can’t be true. So which is true and which isn’t? Or are both untrue? HELP! Until recently, most researchers developed their evidence-analysis skills by a process of trial-and-error. Unfortunately, many researchers have erred more than tried and seem to be the ones most prolific in publishing the results of their “research” on the internet. Yet these errors can prove disastrous, gobbling up our precious time and money as we search in the wrong place – or worse, as we pursue the wrong ancestral line. So how do we ensure that our conclusions are accurate? This seminar will show you how to evaluate our ancestral information – that is, how to weight each piece of information to determine its accuracy – using a clear, logical, easy-to-follow system. After learning these skills you’ll easily be able to determine which information is reliable and which is like a virus that can destroy all your hard work.
Thu, October 12 2023: 0:00 UTC
Register for free
1:04:36
Methodology and Skills
I Hate Conflict! Mediating Sources that Don’t Agree
Elizabeth Williams Gomoll, CG
1.2K views
CC
I Hate Conflict! Mediating Sources that Don’t Agree
Sooner or later, every family researcher comes across information that conflicts with what was found earlier - a date, a name, a place. How can the conflict be resolved, and if it cannot, what to do?
Methodology and Skills
I Hate Conflict! Mediating Sources that Don’t Agree
CC
Elizabeth Williams Gomoll, CG
1.2K views
Sooner or later, every family researcher comes across information that conflicts with what was found earlier - a date, a name, a place. How can the conflict be resolved, and if it cannot, what to do?
Wed, July 19 2023: 18:00 UTC
Register for free
Advanced
1:21:34
Best of ESMMethodology and Skills
Trousers, Black Domestic, Tacks & Housekeeping Bills: Problem-Solving with “Trivial Details”
Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL
3.0K views
CC
Trousers, Black Domestic, Tacks & Housekeeping Bills: Problem-Solving with “Trivial Details”
The records we use are filled with “trivia,” bits and pieces of information that seem to have no “genealogical” value—at least not until we become more innovative in our research and analysis. Each piece of trivia in every document is an opportunity waiting to be connected to something else. Our ability to resolve problems depends upon our ability to make those connections. This class explores eighteen types of records and the kind of hidden clues each offers to help us resolve problems of identity, kinship, and origin. *** This class requires an active webinar membership to attend. ***
Best of ESMMethodology and Skills
Trousers, Black Domestic, Tacks & Housekeeping Bills: Problem-Solving with “Trivial Details”
CC
Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL
3.0K views
The records we use are filled with “trivia,” bits and pieces of information that seem to have no “genealogical” value—at least not until we become more innovative in our research and analysis. Each piece of trivia in every document is an opportunity waiting to be connected to something else. Our ability to resolve problems depends upon our ability to make those connections. This class explores eighteen types of records and the kind of hidden clues each offers to help us resolve problems of identity, kinship, and origin. *** This class requires an active webinar membership to attend. ***
Fri, January 27 2023: 19:00 UTC
Register for free
57:22
Methodology and SkillsWebtember
Indirect Evidence, A Case Study: The Parents of Elizabeth Wingate in Maryland (1795–1860)
Rebecca Whitman Koford, CG, CGL
1.3K views
CC
Indirect Evidence, A Case Study: The Parents of Elizabeth Wingate in Maryland (1795–1860)
We all have lost Elizabeths in our tree. This lecture will discuss how the understanding and application of indirect evidence is such a valuable instrument in your methodology tool-kit. This case study will examine methods and sources that contributed to finding the parents of Elizabeth Wingate (1795-1860) of Baltimore, Maryland.
Methodology and SkillsWebtember
Indirect Evidence, A Case Study: The Parents of Elizabeth Wingate in Maryland (1795–1860)
CC
Rebecca Whitman Koford, CG, CGL
1.3K views
We all have lost Elizabeths in our tree. This lecture will discuss how the understanding and application of indirect evidence is such a valuable instrument in your methodology tool-kit. This case study will examine methods and sources that contributed to finding the parents of Elizabeth Wingate (1795-1860) of Baltimore, Maryland.
Fri, September 30 2022: 16:45 UTC
Register for free
5:08
Methodology and SkillsWebinar Shorts
How I survived a genealogy emergency
Geoff Rasmussen
2.1K views
CC
How I survived a genealogy emergency
Don't let this happen to you. Join Geoff Rasmussen for a quick look at how he overcame this genealogy emergency.
Methodology and SkillsWebinar Shorts
How I survived a genealogy emergency
CC
Geoff Rasmussen
2.1K views
Don't let this happen to you. Join Geoff Rasmussen for a quick look at how he overcame this genealogy emergency.
Thu, July 21 2022: 0:00 UTC
Register for free
1:19:11
BCGMethodology and Skills
Negative Evidence: Making Something Out of Nothing
Denise E. Cross, MSLIS, CG
1.7K views
CC
Negative Evidence: Making Something Out of Nothing
When is not finding a record nothing, and when does it signify something? Information that is not where you expect it to be may yield important evidence for your research question. Understanding the purpose of a source — who and what it records, and why — will help you determine if the missing person or event is negative evidence or merely a negative search. A series of examples demonstrate methodologies used to create something out of nothing.
BCGMethodology and Skills
Negative Evidence: Making Something Out of Nothing
CC
Denise E. Cross, MSLIS, CG
1.7K views
When is not finding a record nothing, and when does it signify something? Information that is not where you expect it to be may yield important evidence for your research question. Understanding the purpose of a source — who and what it records, and why — will help you determine if the missing person or event is negative evidence or merely a negative search. A series of examples demonstrate methodologies used to create something out of nothing.
Wed, June 22 2022: 0:00 UTC
Register for free
6:08
Methodology and SkillsWebinar Shorts
How I Debunked an Online Tree Hint
Geoff Rasmussen
1.4K views
CC
How I Debunked an Online Tree Hint
Hints in online trees can provide genealogical treasures, but if you're not careful they can lead to genealogical regret. In this quick video, Geoff Rasmussen shows why hints should be explored, scrutinized and evaluated.
Methodology and SkillsWebinar Shorts
How I Debunked an Online Tree Hint
CC
Geoff Rasmussen
1.4K views
Hints in online trees can provide genealogical treasures, but if you're not careful they can lead to genealogical regret. In this quick video, Geoff Rasmussen shows why hints should be explored, scrutinized and evaluated.
Fri, June 10 2022: 0:00 UTC
Login to register (for webinar members)
Login to register (for webinar members)
1:03:56
Methodology and Skills
Indirect Evidence – A Case Study
Pauline C. Merrick
1.3K views
CC
Indirect Evidence – A Case Study
This Connecticut-based, indirect evidence case study will highlight techniques for researching a woman whose maiden name is known, but her parents are unknown due to deficiencies in the vital records. Techniques will be demonstrated that rely on forming hypotheses and gathering evidence to test those hypotheses. Thorough research of neighbors and associates (the FAN principle) will yield enough evidence to tie this woman back into her family. Records used include pre-1850 census records, deeds, probate, church, and court. Death records of family members provide the final clues that tie them all together.
Methodology and Skills
Indirect Evidence – A Case Study
CC
Pauline C. Merrick
1.3K views
This Connecticut-based, indirect evidence case study will highlight techniques for researching a woman whose maiden name is known, but her parents are unknown due to deficiencies in the vital records. Techniques will be demonstrated that rely on forming hypotheses and gathering evidence to test those hypotheses. Thorough research of neighbors and associates (the FAN principle) will yield enough evidence to tie this woman back into her family. Records used include pre-1850 census records, deeds, probate, church, and court. Death records of family members provide the final clues that tie them all together.
Wed, May 18 2022: 18:00 UTC
Register for free