DNA in Action 2 of 6: Writing Proofs including DNA

Karen Stanbary, CG®, CGG®
Apr 15, 2026
631 views
CC
Free
Free through April 23, 2026

About this webinar

Building on the methodology from the first session, this webinar focuses on how to write up your findings. You will learn the decision-making process for creating written proofs, generation-by-generation. The examples seamlessly blend evidence from documentary and genetic sources with reasoning to create a defensible conclusion that meets the Genealogical Proof Standard.

About the speaker

Karen Stanbary, MA, LCSW, CG®, CGG ®, BCG Trustee and Vice President, is an author and national lecturer focusing on topics related to using genetic evidence correlated with documentary evidence to so...
Learn more...

Key points and insights

Writing a defensible conclusion is a critical skill for any researcher looking to integrate genetic data into a family history narrative. This webinar, part of the "DNA in Action" series, provides a robust framework for translating complex DNA results and documentary evidence into clear, written proof arguments. By focusing on a generation-by-generation methodology, the session demonstrates how to meet the Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS) while navigating common obstacles such as misattributed parentage, pedigree collapse, and scant historical records. This presentation is essential for genealogists who want to ensure their biological findings are professionally verified, logically sound, and accessible to future generations.

  • Reasoning as the Essential Glue: While software tools and diagrams are useful for data presentation, they cannot communicate the underlying logic required to prove a relationship; instead, clear narrative reasoning using nouns and verbs is necessary to tie documentary and genetic evidence together into a cohesive argument.
  • DNA as Indirect Evidence: DNA test results serve as direct evidence of a biological connection but only offer indirect evidence regarding the specific type of relationship. Researchers must use syllogisms—logical "if-then" statements—to distinguish between various relationship possibilities and to test hypotheses against the available data.
  • Strategic Pedigree Mitigation: To achieve a defensible conclusion, researchers must actively rule out competing hypotheses, such as shared ancestors on other family lines, through thorough pedigree evaluation and the use of source-cited tables that reveal patterns in numerical data.

For those ready to move beyond shortcuts and master the art of genealogical documentation, viewing the full webinar offers a visual, color-coded walkthrough of actual case studies spanning four generations. The presentation provides a rare look at how to handle unexpected "twists and turns," such as DNA outliers and unknown half-relationships, with professional rigor and transparency. Genealogists are also encouraged to explore the additional resources in the five-page syllabus, which contains extensive documentation templates, reference tools, and source-cited tables designed to elevate the quality of any family history project.


Comments (47)

Sort byNewest
  1. RT
    ruth trusler
    2 days ago

    Great. Learned a lot. Thank you.

  2. AW
    Alicia Weiss
    4 days ago

    No one does this better than Karen!

  3. RM
    ROBERT MCDONALD
    5 days ago

    Lots of good information and relevant examples for crafting a DNA proof argument. Best presentation I've seen this year!

  4. KM
    Kristi Murdock
    5 days ago

    This was extremely helpful! Great presentation, great clarity, terrific examples, loved the step-by-step development.

  5. AW
    Allison Willis
    5 days ago

    Awesome webinar, great information ti use!1

  6. AK
    Alaine M Kier
    5 days ago

    Karen's presentation on this topic is exceptional.

  7. DC
    Donna Chavarro
    5 days ago

    I learned how important it is to document your findings… going to go back to the beginning to add documentation. Thanks!

  8. CS
    Cindy Suda
    5 days ago

    Wonderful examples for writing proofs! I really enjoyed seeing the logic behind using tables. We can do this! :D